Overturning NASDAQ’s Board Diversity Rule: Implications for DEI and Governance
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

Overturning NASDAQ’s Board Diversity Rule: Implications for DEI and Governance

/ Quick Take

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s December 11 overturning of NASDAQ’s board diversity rule—which had been approved by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and required listed companies to have at least one female director and one director from an underrepresented group or to publicly explain noncompliance—presents both opportunities and challenges for companies. On the one hand, it alleviates compliance obligations; on the other, it is likely to spur additional legal scrutiny of corporate diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI) efforts.

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s December 11 overturning of NASDAQ’s board diversity rule—which had been approved by the US Securities and Exchange Commission and required listed companies to have at least one female director and one director from an underrepresented group or to publicly explain noncompliance—presents both opportunities and challenges for companies. On the one hand, it alleviates compliance obligations; on the other, it is likely to spur additional legal scrutiny of corporate diversity, equity & inclusion (DEI) efforts.

Key Insight

In practice, compliance with the NASDAQ rule was already widespread. Only 2.2% of Russell 3000 companies—which largely overlap with NASDAQ-listed firms—lacked a female director in 2024, and overall board diversity levels are at record highs. However, the recent decline in the share of newly appointed non-White directors may also indicate that momentum is slowing. The removal of the NASDAQ rule—and the exchange’s assertion that it would “not seek further review”—will likely heighten scrutiny of corporate DEI programs, both at the board level and more broadly. To effectively navigate this shifting landscape, companies can:

Authors

This publication is only available to Members. Please sign in to your myTCB® account to access it. To learn more about becoming a Member, click here. To check if your company is a Member, click here

myTCB® Members get exclusive access to webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to events.

Other Related Resources

C-Suite Insights - Stay updated on the biggest issues facing business executives.