Members of The Conference Board get exclusive access to the full range of products and services that deliver Trusted Insights for What's Ahead ® including webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to conferences and events.
05 April 2013 / Report
The use of external peer benchmarking in setting executive compensation has contributed to the problem of high and rising pay in the United States. The pay awarded to CEOs is becoming profoundly detached from not only the pay of the average worker, but also from the companies they run. Offsetting the current reliance on external metrics with the use of internal metrics and benchmarking could help curb the persistent escalation of pay. If directors are not constrained by notions of “competitive” pay, they may be able to reduce unnecessary pay increases and deliver compensation that is more acceptable to shareholders.
The use of external peer benchmarking in setting executive compensation has contributed to the problem of high and rising pay in the United States. The pay awarded to CEOs is becoming profoundly detached from not only the pay of the average worker, but also from the companies they run. Offsetting the current reliance on external metrics with the use of internal metrics and benchmarking could help curb the persistent escalation of pay. If directors are not constrained by notions of “competitive” pay, they may be able to reduce unnecessary pay increases and deliver compensation that is more acceptable to shareholders.
myTCB® Members get exclusive access to webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to events.
You already have an account with The Conference Board.
Please try to login in with your email or click here if you have forgotten your password.
CEO and Executive Compensation in the Russell 3000 and S&P 500: 2021 Edition
September 13, 2021