The Price of a Deal
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

Policymakers are staking their positions on a US debt ceiling compromise, meaning raising, suspending, or repealing the debt limit may come at the cost of federal spending cuts. This report explores what comes next now that mandatory and discretionary federal government spending, along with their defense and nondefense components, are probably all on the table.

Key Insights

Policymakers are staking their positions on a US debt ceiling compromise, meaning raising, suspending, or repealing the debt limit may come at the cost of federal spending cuts. This report explores what comes next now that mandatory and discretionary federal government spending, along with their defense and nondefense components, are probably all on the table.

Key Insights

  • The red sweep (i.e., GOP control over both houses of Congress and the White House) does not guarantee smooth sailing for key pieces of legislation in 2025, including for the debt limit.
  • Like any other political party, the Republican party is heterogeneous, and there will not be unanimity on every issue. Indeed, the cost of doing fiscal business may be spending cuts. Mandatory and discretionary outlays for defense and nondefense items are on the table.
  • While revenue raisers, including select tax hikes, widening the tax base, and closing loopholes, should also be a part of debt reduction strategy, they are currently not a part of the debate.
  • Cutting waste and generating efficiencies can lower costs and increase productivity. However, significant federal spending reductions to programs that are critical for economic functioning, financial market stability, and social well-being might be highly disruptive and materially weigh on the US economy over the short run.
  • Still, Democrats and some Republicans are likely to ask for material concessions to cutting federal programs and some tax reform in exchange for a deal on the debt limit.

Author

Dana M. Peterson

Dana M. Peterson Dana M. Peterson

Chief Economist and Leader, Economy, Strategy & Fi…
The Conference Board

Read Bio

This publication is available to you, but you need to sign in to myTCB® or create an account to access it.To learn more about becoming a Member click here. To check if your company is a Member, click here

Sign In

Forgot your password

Create An Account

 

Keep my computer signed in

Forgot your password

Create An Account

myTCB® Members get exclusive access to webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to events.

Other Related Resources