SEC Policy Change Upends Shareholder Proposal Review Process
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

SEC Policy Change Upends Shareholder Proposal Review Process

/ Quick Take

This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that companies may now exclude shareholder proposals from proxy statements without first obtaining staff review or a “no-action” response under Rule 14a-8. The change, outlined by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, applies to the 2025–2026 proxy season and marks a sharp departure from the staff’s historic gatekeeping role.

This week, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced that companies may now exclude shareholder proposals from proxy statements without first obtaining staff review or a “no-action” response under Rule 14a-8. The change, outlined by the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance, applies to the 2025–2026 proxy season and marks a sharp departure from the staff’s historic gatekeeping role.

Companies must still notify both the SEC and proponents at least 80 days before filing their definitive proxy materials, as required under Rule 14a-8(j). However, issuers will now decide independently whether a proposal may be excluded, leaving proponents to challenge exclusions retroactively through litigation or commission appeal. Limited review will continue only for requests made under Rule 14a-8(i)(1)—which applies to proposals that may be excluded under state law—but the division will no longer issue responses or “no-action” positions on other bases for exclusion.

The division attributed the change to resource and timing constraints following the recent government shutdown and the extensive guidance already available to companies. The shift reflects a broader effort to streamline staff responsibilities and reduce the commission’s direct involvement in individual exclusion determinations, effectively scaling back the SEC’s longstandin

Author

This publication is available to you, but you need to sign in to myTCB® or create an account to access it.To learn more about becoming a Member click here. To check if your company is a Member, click here

myTCB® Members get exclusive access to webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to events.

Other Related Resources