Replacing EB-5 Visas with “Gold Cards”: Impact on CRE Market
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

Navigating Washington: Insights for Business

Global Economy Briefs

Timely insights from the Economy, Strategy & Finance Center

Replacing EB-5 Visas with “Gold Cards” Could Leave Hole in Commercial Real Estate Market


The President recently announced a plan for a “gold card” visa program to provide permanent residency and a “path to citizenship” that would cost $5 million and replace the EB-5 program. Although the Administration doesn’t have that authority without authorization from Congress, the potential elimination of the EB-5 program has many in commercial real estate concerned.

Understanding the existing program: The current EB-5 visa program has helped fund huge real estate projects, including New York’s Hudson Yards and The Wharf in Washington, DC, through foreign investment. EB-5 visa holders invest roughly $1 million into job-creating projects as part of their paths to green cards.

The existing program raised more than $2 billion in each of the last two years, with the majority of it directed to commercial real estate projects, including office, industrial, and multi-family residential properties. This has been particularly useful during a time of high interest rates and constrained lending.

Foreign investors using the EB-5 program are seeking citizenship, not specific returns on investment, which has given latitude to commercial real estate developers. The developer of a 19-story residential tower described how financing through traditional capital markets could come with 10-12% interest rates, compared to only 5-7% with EB-5 investors, cutting the cost of capital significantly.

The TCB take: The Administration should make sure replacing the EB-5 program with the “gold card” does not reduce the foreign investment market for real estate financing and that terms are clear.

The proposed “gold card” references $5 million being paid as a fee or donation, not as an investment, which would be paid back (as it is with the EB-5 program). Understanding who would receive this fee, and how it would be invested in the US economy has not been detailed.

This creates uncertainty for real estate developers seeking foreign investment. As currently described, the “gold card” program could shrink the pool of investors, due to bringing up the cost-of-entry to $5 million from about $1 million with the EB-5 program.

Replacing EB-5 Visas with “Gold Cards”: Impact on CRE Market

March 07, 2025

Replacing EB-5 Visas with “Gold Cards” Could Leave Hole in Commercial Real Estate Market


The President recently announced a plan for a “gold card” visa program to provide permanent residency and a “path to citizenship” that would cost $5 million and replace the EB-5 program. Although the Administration doesn’t have that authority without authorization from Congress, the potential elimination of the EB-5 program has many in commercial real estate concerned.

Understanding the existing program: The current EB-5 visa program has helped fund huge real estate projects, including New York’s Hudson Yards and The Wharf in Washington, DC, through foreign investment. EB-5 visa holders invest roughly $1 million into job-creating projects as part of their paths to green cards.

The existing program raised more than $2 billion in each of the last two years, with the majority of it directed to commercial real estate projects, including office, industrial, and multi-family residential properties. This has been particularly useful during a time of high interest rates and constrained lending.

Foreign investors using the EB-5 program are seeking citizenship, not specific returns on investment, which has given latitude to commercial real estate developers. The developer of a 19-story residential tower described how financing through traditional capital markets could come with 10-12% interest rates, compared to only 5-7% with EB-5 investors, cutting the cost of capital significantly.

The TCB take: The Administration should make sure replacing the EB-5 program with the “gold card” does not reduce the foreign investment market for real estate financing and that terms are clear.

The proposed “gold card” references $5 million being paid as a fee or donation, not as an investment, which would be paid back (as it is with the EB-5 program). Understanding who would receive this fee, and how it would be invested in the US economy has not been detailed.

This creates uncertainty for real estate developers seeking foreign investment. As currently described, the “gold card” program could shrink the pool of investors, due to bringing up the cost-of-entry to $5 million from about $1 million with the EB-5 program.

Author

This publication is only available to Members. Please sign in to your myTCB® account to access it. To learn more about becoming a Member, click here. To check if your company is a Member, click here.

myTCB® Members get exclusive access to webcasts, publications, data and analysis, plus discounts to events.

More From This Series

Publications

MSPB Regains Quorum, Questions Remain

MSPB Regains Quorum, Questions Remain

October 21, 2025 | Newsletters & Alerts

Funding for Courts Runs Out, Limiting Operations

Funding for Courts Runs Out, Limiting Operations

October 21, 2025 | Newsletters & Alerts

New Tariffs on Lumber, Wood Products

New Tariffs on Lumber, Wood Products

October 16, 2025 | Newsletters & Alerts



Upcoming Events


Press Releases / In the News