Policy Alert: OECD Global Tax Agreement Withdrawal
Our Privacy Policy has been updated! The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "ACCEPT", you acknowledge our privacy policy and consent to the use of cookies. 

CED Newsletters & Policy Alerts

Timely Public Policy insights for what's ahead

Policy Alert: OECD Global Tax Agreement Withdrawal

January 24, 2025

What it does: The Memorandum directs the Treasury Department to inform the OECD that the US will not implement the OECD/G-20 global corporate tax agreement (“Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting”) that subjects multinational corporations with revenues above 750 million euros to a minimum 15 percent tax on profits. The agreement, which now includes 146 jurisdictions, is intended to prevent corporations from limiting their tax burden by shifting income and operations between high- and low-tax jurisdictions. The Memorandum also directs the Treasury to investigate other jurisdictions’ compliance with existing tax treaties with the US and other tax policies and present the President with options for responding to non-compliance or rules discriminating against US companies.    

Key Insights

  • While the Biden Administration helped negotiate and strongly supported the agreement, Republicans in Congress strongly opposed implementation and would not have enacted the statutory changes necessary for the US to adopt the Framework. The Memorandum simply clarifies that previous commitment have “no force or effect” absent a law implementing the relevant provisions, effectively withdrawing the US from the Framework. 

  • However, other jurisdictions – including the European Union, Japan, Korea, and the United Kingdom – are moving ahead with implementation, which may still result in US companies being subject to the minimum tax abroad, and therefore possible retaliation from the US, including through trade policies (e.g., tariffs) with those countries. 

  • The Memorandum does not repeal statutory provisions or regulations subjecting US companies to minimum tax burdens, such as the Global Intangible Low Tax income (GILTI) and the Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax (BEAT). Both were adopted as part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. 

 

More From This Series

Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts