The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 
Peer Groups Understanding CEO Compensation and a Proposal for a New Approach

Subscribe to Director Notes

The use of external peer benchmarking in setting executive compensation has contributed to the problem of high and rising pay in the United States. The pay awarded to CEOs is becoming profoundly detached from not only the pay of the average worker, but also from the companies they run. Offsetting the current reliance on external metrics with the use of internal metrics and benchmarking could help curb the persistent escalation of pay. If directors are not constrained by notions of “competitive” pay, they may be able to reduce unnecessary pay increases and deliver compensation that is more acceptable to shareholders.

Director Notes (7 pgs)
Complimentary: Sign in or create an account to download.