The Trouble with Directors
The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

The Trouble with Directors

  • Publication Date:

The great irony is that where stellar performance by independent directors is most needed, it is least likely to happen and where great performance is least needed, it is most likely to happen. Essentially, board governance works like a driver’s-education course. Careful, dutiful new drivers take driver’s-ed courses. Impulsive, bad new drivers don’t, and so never improve. This is what economists call an adverse selection bias. Circumstances cause exactly the wrong drivers to select the option of taking a driver’s-education course. If we accept that boards exist to protect shareholders, then exactly the wrong companies have great, functioning boards.


OTHER RELATED CONTENT

RESEARCH & INSIGHTS