The Conference Board uses cookies to improve our website, enhance your experience, and deliver relevant messages and offers about our products. Detailed information on the use of cookies on this site is provided in our cookie policy. For more information on how The Conference Board collects and uses personal data, please visit our privacy policy. By continuing to use this Site or by clicking "OK", you consent to the use of cookies. 

30 Jun. 2015 | Comments (1)

For further analysis on the topic below, read our major report on looming labor shortages in the U.S. and other advanced economies.

Click here to read other related blogs on this topic by Dr. Gad Levanon.

 

This blog is going to be relatively short because, as they say, a picture is worth a thousand words. In recent months, one of the charts that I have been presenting, featured below, has made a particularly strong impression. I thought it was worth writing a short blog about it.

So what’s in this chart? The yellow line shows the five year percent change in US labor productivity for the non-farm business sector. In the past five years (ending in Q1 of 2015), labor productivity grew by just 0.6%, the lowest growth rate on record except during the recessions of the early 1980s. To have such weak growth in a period of economic expansion is unprecedented1.

Chart 1 (Click to expand): The sum of Labor force growth and labor productivity growth is historically low

Source: BLS; calculations by The Conference Board

The blue line shows the growth rate of the labor force, which has been historically low in recent years for two main reasons: (1) the massive retirement of the baby boomers, and (2) the participation rate of the working-age population declined and has yet to recover. The most interesting line, though, is the green line, which is the sum of the yellow and blue lines. The green line could be viewed as the growth rate of the production capacity of the US labor force. In other words, it is quite similar to the growth rate of potential GDP. In the past five years this measure grew at just 1%, which is by far the lowest ever recorded in the United States. Until now it was never below 2%, and it usually hovered around 3-5%.

Chart 2 (Click to expand): How does it compare to actual GDP Growth?

 
Source: Haver Analytics; calculations by The Conference Board

In Chart 2, we show how this line compares to actual GDP growth in recent decades. On average, actual GDP grew more slowly than the sum of labor force and productivity growth2.

So does that mean the new trend growth for the U.S. economy is just one percent? No, I wouldn’t go that far, but 1.5% sounds reasonable. Regarding labor force growth, I don’t expect it to accelerate in the coming years given the weak projection of working-age population growth. The BLS projects the labor force to grow just 0.5% from 2012 to 2022.

Regarding productivity growth, there is a huge debate among economists (see here and here), but it would not be that surprising if the new trend in total economy productivity growth does not exceed 1%. As a result, a new trend growth for the U.S. economy that is no higher than 1.5% wouldn’t surprise me. If that turns out to be the case, GDP will grow much more slowly in the coming decades than official forecasts from the White House, Congress and the Federal Reserve (all projecting 2-2.5 percent), with major implications for fiscal and monetary policy.

Businesses as well are likely to be influenced by this new normal. As we discussed many times, the tightening labor market is creating labor shortages which will impact hiring, retention and compensation growth. On top of that, weaker growth of the economy will limit revenue growth with further negative implications for corporate profits.

 
View our complete listing of  Labor Markets blogs.

1 In a recent report, The Conference Board details the context of the productivity crisis in depth, illustrates the relationship between productivity and profitability, and provides specific ways to reverse the productivity slowdown. Click here to read it.

2 which is partly due to the fact that the productivity measure we use is for the non-farm business sector. Productivity in this sector typically grows faster than productivity for the US economy as a whole.

  • About the Author:Gad Levanon, PhD

    Gad Levanon, PhD

    Gad Levanon is Vice President, Labor Markets for The Conference Board, where he oversees the labor market, US forecasting, and Help Wanted OnLine© programs. His research focuses on trends in…

    Full Bio | More from Gad Levanon, PhD

     

1 Comment Comment Policy

Please Sign In to post a comment.
  1. David Fjeld 0 people like this 30 Jun. 2015 03:10 PM

    Even measuring productivity in the service sector (especially the financial sector) makes little sense if trying to compare to the larger manufacturing sector of old. I didn't (see here and here) to see what other economists found but historically, especially in the transition of the 80's to a service based economy and lack of infrastructure growth, productivity was a good measure only to define how inflation escaped wage parity. A GDP measure without defining useful goods is no longer of much use. Consuming more health care is an example.


Subscribe to the Labor Markets Blog
SUBSCRIBE HERE
Support Our Work

Support our nonpartisan, nonprofit research and insights which help leaders address societal challenges.

Donate

OTHER RELATED CONTENT

RESEARCH & INSIGHTS

WEBCASTS

CONFERENCES & EVENTS

The 2021 IBI/Conference Board Health and Productivity Forum

The 2021 IBI/Conference Board Health and Productivity Forum

October 05 - 06, 2021 | (Chicago, Illinois)

Data Privacy

Data Privacy

May 11, 2021

Global Horizons

Global Horizons

March 23 - 25, 2021

COUNCILS

BLOGS

PRESS RELEASES & IN THE NEWS